Scientific American✓ Add us as a preferred source on Google
🔄 Data last refreshed 27 days ago
🤝
Make a deal with Scientific American
🔒 Paid proposals held safely in escrow — released only when the work's approved.
Followers
4.3M
Posts
77.8K
Following
789
Account age
18 yrs
💰 Suggested sponsorship rate
$23.8K – $38.7K / sponsored post
Estimated from audience size & typical reach — every deal is negotiable and held in SocialDB escrow.
🎁 Free analysisfor Scientific American
📊 Post performance
1.3M
Avg views / post
30%
Reach vs followers
May 2008
On X since
🔥 Top post: For only the second time in our 179-year history, the editors of · 11.2M views
📊 Activity & format
Posting cadence
0.05 / week
A lower-frequency account — each post lands with more weight.
Content mix
Mostly text
Recent: 0 video · 7 image · 11 text.
Follower / following
5.4K×
Follows 789 back. A strong ratio — an audience that follows them, not a follow-for-follow network.
Verification
✓ X Premium
A paid X Premium (Blue) verified account.
Recent posts
View on X ↗
Kamala Harris has plans to improve health, boost the economy, and mitigate climate change. Donald Trump has threats and a dangerous record.
That’s why the editors of Scientific American are endorsing Kamala Harris for president. | Editor…
A novel way of making superheavy elements could soon add a new row to the periodic table, allowing scientists to explore uncharted atomic realms
A novel way of making superheavy elements could soon add a new row to the periodic table, allowing scientists to explore uncharted atomic realms
As the daughter of a cancer researcher, Kamala Harris would bring a lifelong familiarity with science to the presidency, experts say
The notion that men evolved to hunt and women to tend to children and domestic duties is one of anthropology’s most influential ideas. But the available data do not support it. Evidence from studies of physiology, archaeology and fossils p…
A steadily growing body of scientific evidence demonstrates that "rapid-onset gender dysphoria" claims do not reflect transgender adolescents’ experiences and that “social contagion” is not causing more young people to seek gender-affirmin…
Joe Biden will soon be president of the United States, and scientists the world over are breathing a collective sigh of relief.
Editorial: Instead of thinking about whether to vote Democratic or Republican in the upcoming U.S. election, think about voting to protect science instead of destroying it.
The evidence and the science show that Donald Trump has badly damaged the U.S. and its people—because he rejects evidence and science.
The most devastating example is his willfully ignorant response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which cost mo…
Scientific American has never endorsed a presidential candidate in our 175-year history—until now.
The 2020 election is literally a matter of life and death. We urge you to vote for health, science and Joe Biden for President.
Happy 30th birthday, @NASAHubble! 🎂🥳
The notion that men evolved to hunt and women to tend to children and domestic duties is one of anthropology’s most influential ideas. But the available data do not support it. Evidence from studies of physiology, archaeology and fossils p…
A steadily growing body of scientific evidence demonstrates that "rapid-onset gender dysphoria" claims do not reflect transgender adolescents’ experiences and that “social contagion” is not causing more young people to seek gender-affirmin…
Joe Biden will soon be president of the United States, and scientists the world over are breathing a collective sigh of relief.
Editorial: Instead of thinking about whether to vote Democratic or Republican in the upcoming U.S. election, think about voting to protect science instead of destroying it.
The evidence and the science show that Donald Trump has badly damaged the U.S. and its people—because he rejects evidence and science.
The most devastating example is his willfully ignorant response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which cost mo…
Scientific American has never endorsed a presidential candidate in our 175-year history—until now.
The 2020 election is literally a matter of life and death. We urge you to vote for health, science and Joe Biden for President.
Happy 30th birthday, @NASAHubble! 🎂🥳
💡 Facts
🗓️Joined X in 2008 — 18 years ago.
👁️Averages 1.3M views per post.
📤Posts about 0.1× per week.
💬0.63% engagement rate.
🏅Earned the 1M Followers for passing 1M followers.
🕵️ Fake follower check
Estimated46/100
Fair
Credibility score
69%
Mixed
Real audience
Medium
Fake-follower risk
High
Data confidence
- Est. 69% real, active audience · Medium fake-follower risk.
- Low engagement (~0.3× of followers engage each post) — a sign of an inflated or inactive audience.
- Organic base — far more followers than accounts it follows.
- Verified account.
- Established account (18+ years old).
- 0.63% engagement — below the ~10.8% typical for this size.
Heuristic estimate from engagement, follower ratios, account age & growth — a screening signal, not a guarantee.
About
Awesome discoveries. Expert insights. Science that shapes the world.
📸 Gallery
🔀 Audience overlap
EstimatedEstimated shared audience with similar creators — useful for avoiding overlap (or doubling down) when planning a campaign.
Xi Van Fleet
17%
Jamal Musiala
15%
The Collectibles Guru
14%
Gauthamvasudevmenon
14%
Nyvi Estephan 🎥🎮🎤
14%
New Scientist
11%
More like this
Find more →
X
＋
New Scientist ✓
@newscientist
4.3M
Followers
X
＋
The Collectibles Guru ✓
@gurucollects
160K
Followers
X
＋
Gauthamvasudevmenon ✓
@menongautham
3.6M
Followers
X
＋
Nyvi Estephan 🎥🎮🎤 ✓
@nyviestephan
365.8K
Followers
X
＋
Xi Van Fleet ✓
@xvanfleet
204.4K
Followers
X
＋
Jamal Musiala ✓
@jamalmusiala
827.3K
Followers
Frequently asked questions
How much does Scientific American charge for a sponsorship?
Scientific American hasn't published fixed prices yet. Send a proposal through SocialDB and agree terms directly — your payment is held in escrow until the work is approved.
How do I contact Scientific American for a brand deal or collaboration?
Send a paid deal or collab request right here on SocialDB — we notify Scientific American, and once they accept, your payment is held safely in escrow and released when the work is approved. You don't need to track down an email.
How many followers does Scientific American have?
Scientific American has 4,254,136 followers on X.
✉ Message Scientific American
Reaching out to influencers is a Pro feature. Upgrade to message any influencer directly — perfect for brands and agencies booking sponsorships.
- ✓ Message any influencer from their listing
- ✓ The influencer gets notified by email
- ✓ Manage every conversation in one inbox
Already Pro? Log in.
🎤 Event / appearance with Scientific American
Booking an event / appearance is a Pro feature. Upgrade to book Scientific American for an in-person or virtual appearance — payment held safely in escrow until the event is done.
- ✓ Book them for events, livestreams, panels & more
- ✓ Scientific American gets notified by email
- ✓ Fee held in escrow, released after the appearance
Already Pro? Log in.
🚀
You're out of free requests this month
Free accounts get 5 per month. Go Pro for unlimited sponsor pitches, collab requests & sponsorship deals — plus featured placement, the Verified badge, free withdrawals and more.
Upgrade to Pro — $9.95/mo →Your free limit resets on the 1st of next month.
Auto-generated from X's public data — no affiliation with or endorsement by SocialDB. Is this you? Claim it · Remove