LIVE
3.06M influencer listings 🏢42.4K sponsor listings 🌍61.14B combined audience reach 📊13 platforms indexed 🗺️130+ countries covered 🏷️10,000+ niches 🦋1.14M Bluesky creators 🟣742K Twitch creators 🎙️714.8K podcast creators 🐘150K Mastodon creators 🥊81.8K Kick creators ▶️76.9K YouTube creators ✈️52K Telegram creators 𝕏51.3K X creators 🎵23.6K TikTok creators 📈13.4K Pinterest creators 🎮5.7K Discord creators 🎬3.6K Rumble creators 📈1.6K Substack creators 🧵1.3K Threads creators 3.06M influencer listings 🏢42.4K sponsor listings 🌍61.14B combined audience reach 📊13 platforms indexed 🗺️130+ countries covered 🏷️10,000+ niches 🦋1.14M Bluesky creators 🟣742K Twitch creators 🎙️714.8K podcast creators 🐘150K Mastodon creators 🥊81.8K Kick creators ▶️76.9K YouTube creators ✈️52K Telegram creators 𝕏51.3K X creators 🎵23.6K TikTok creators 📈13.4K Pinterest creators 🎮5.7K Discord creators 🎬3.6K Rumble creators 📈1.6K Substack creators 🧵1.3K Threads creators
Scientific American

Scientific American

X @sciam
🔄 Data last refreshed 17 hours ago
🤝

Make a deal with Scientific American

🔒 Paid proposals held safely in escrow — released only when the work's approved.

Every booking is a normal escrow-protected deal.

Followers
4.25M
Posts
77.7K
Following
788
Account age
18 yrs
🎁 Free analysisfor Scientific American

Known for

📊 Post performance

1.27M
Avg views / post
30%
Reach vs followers
May 2008
On X since

🔥 Top post: For only the second time in our 179-year history, the editors of · 11.16M views

📊 Activity & format

Posting cadence
0.05 / week
A lower-frequency account — each post lands with more weight.
Content mix
Mostly text
Recent: 0 video · 7 image · 11 text.
Follower / following
5.4K×
Follows 788 back. A strong ratio — an audience that follows them, not a follow-for-follow network.
Verification
✓ X Premium
A paid X Premium (Blue) verified account.

Recent posts

View on X ↗
🔥 Top post For only the second time in our 179-year history, the editors of Scientific American are endorsing a candidate for president. That person is @KamalaHarris. | Editorial 11.16M❤ 47.5K🔁 30.7K
Kamala Harris has plans to improve health, boost the economy, and mitigate climate change. Donald Trump has threats and a dangerous record. That’s why the editors of Scientific American are endorsing Kamala Harris for president. | Editor… 317.9K❤ 7.5K🔁 3.7K A novel way of making superheavy elements could soon add a new row to the periodic table, allowing scientists to explore uncharted atomic realms 42.4K❤ 117🔁 28 A novel way of making superheavy elements could soon add a new row to the periodic table, allowing scientists to explore uncharted atomic realms 41.4K❤ 115🔁 31 As the daughter of a cancer researcher, Kamala Harris would bring a lifelong familiarity with science to the presidency, experts say 3.13M❤ 3.2K🔁 6.5K The notion that men evolved to hunt and women to tend to children and domestic duties is one of anthropology’s most influential ideas. But the available data do not support it. Evidence from studies of physiology, archaeology and fossils p… 2.21M❤ 4.1K🔁 2.2K A steadily growing body of scientific evidence demonstrates that "rapid-onset gender dysphoria" claims do not reflect transgender adolescents’ experiences and that “social contagion” is not causing more young people to seek gender-affirmin… 1.27M❤ 4.4K🔁 2K Joe Biden will soon be president of the United States, and scientists the world over are breathing a collective sigh of relief. ❤ 8.8K🔁 1.4K Editorial: Instead of thinking about whether to vote Democratic or Republican in the upcoming U.S. election, think about voting to protect science instead of destroying it. ❤ 14.7K🔁 5K The evidence and the science show that Donald Trump has badly damaged the U.S. and its people—because he rejects evidence and science. The most devastating example is his willfully ignorant response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which cost mo… ❤ 26.4K🔁 9.3K Scientific American has never endorsed a presidential candidate in our 175-year history—until now. The 2020 election is literally a matter of life and death. We urge you to vote for health, science and Joe Biden for President. ❤ 151.9K🔁 77.9K Happy 30th birthday, @NASAHubble! 🎂🥳 ❤ 5.1K🔁 1.5K

💡 Facts

🗓️Joined X in 2008 — 18 years ago.
👁️Averages 1.27M views per post.
📤Posts about 0.1× per week.
💬0.63% engagement rate.
🏅Earned the 1M Followers for passing 1M followers.

🕵️ Fake follower check

Estimated
46/100
Fair Credibility score
69%
Mixed Real audience
Medium Fake-follower risk
High Data confidence
  • Est. 69% real, active audience · Medium fake-follower risk.
  • Low engagement (~0.3× of followers engage each post) — a sign of an inflated or inactive audience.
  • Organic base — far more followers than accounts it follows.
  • Verified account.
  • Established account (18+ years old).
  • 0.63% engagement — below the ~10.8% typical for this size.

Heuristic estimate from engagement, follower ratios, account age & growth — a screening signal, not a guarantee.

About

Awesome discoveries. Expert insights. Science that shapes the world.

📸 Gallery

✉ Message Scientific American

Reaching out to influencers is a Pro feature. Upgrade to message any influencer directly — perfect for brands and agencies booking sponsorships.

See Pro $9.95/mo →

Already Pro? Log in.

🎤 Event / appearance with Scientific American

Booking an event / appearance is a Pro feature. Upgrade to book Scientific American for an in-person or virtual appearance — payment held safely in escrow until the event is done.

See Pro $9.95/mo →

Already Pro? Log in.

Auto-generated from X's public data — no affiliation with or endorsement by SocialDB. Is this you? Claim it · Remove