LIVE
⭐7.4M influencer listings 🏢86.2K sponsor listings 🌍106.8B combined audience reach 📊13 platforms indexed 🗺️130+ countries covered 🏷️10,000+ niches 🦋3.2M Bluesky creators 🎙️1.4M podcast creators 🟣1.2M Twitch creators 📈517.2K Pinterest creators 🥊254.5K Kick creators 𝕏230K X creators 🐘219.2K Mastodon creators 202.4K YouTube creators 🎵113K TikTok creators ✈️101.3K Telegram creators 🎮12.6K Discord creators 📈5.6K Substack creators 🎬4.6K Rumble creators 🧵3.1K Threads creators ⭐7.4M influencer listings 🏢86.2K sponsor listings 🌍106.8B combined audience reach 📊13 platforms indexed 🗺️130+ countries covered 🏷️10,000+ niches 🦋3.2M Bluesky creators 🎙️1.4M podcast creators 🟣1.2M Twitch creators 📈517.2K Pinterest creators 🥊254.5K Kick creators 𝕏230K X creators 🐘219.2K Mastodon creators 202.4K YouTube creators 🎵113K TikTok creators ✈️101.3K Telegram creators 🎮12.6K Discord creators 📈5.6K Substack creators 🎬4.6K Rumble creators 🧵3.1K Threads creators
PLOS One

PLOS One Add us as a preferred source on Google

X @plosone
🔄 Data last refreshed 1 month ago
Followers
124.1K
Posts
16.5K
Following
2.2K
Account age
17 yrs
🎁 Free analysisfor PLOS One

📊 Activity & format

Posting cadence
0.05 / week
A lower-frequency account — each post lands with more weight.
Content mix
Mostly images
Recent: 0 video · 9 image · 9 text.
Follower / following
57×
Follows 2.2K back. A strong ratio — an audience that follows them, not a follow-for-follow network.

Recent posts

View on X ↗
@GidMK Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We are going to look into these concerns and investigate this case further internally. ❤ 71🔁 3 Good news for #ScientistsWhoSelfie: Research shows scientists who post selfies are perceived as significantly warmer, and potentially more trustworthy. Show us your selfies! ❤ 171🔁 85 We want to extend our apologies to the trans and gender variant community and others affected by the shortcomings of the initial review. PLOS is an inclusive, open and non-discriminatory publisher that deeply cares for the concerns of this… ❤ 183🔁 53 We recognize that issues with the study should have been addressed prior to publication. We have and will learn from the case, and since have completed an internal restructure so that we can better support our Editorial Board &are bett… ❤ 103🔁 11 Although the study represents a valid contribution to the scientific literature, its framing, given its limit to parental observations, needed to be corrected and clarified. A Formal Comment by a member of our Editorial Board provides furt… ❤ 70🔁 23 After consideration of the scientific concerns raised to us, @PLOSONE has corrected the study on gender dysphoria in adolescents and young adults. The decision was made after post-publication review by additional experts. ❤ 340🔁 135 Most UK scientists who publish extremely highly-cited papers do not secure funding from major public and charity funders, new study finds #healthresearchfunding ❤ 63🔁 44 Why does the #zebra have stripes? New research suggests that this age-old question may have a simple answer related to a tiny nuisance... #wildlife #africanwildlife #zebrastripes #Equusquagga https://t.co/K6kN3Sl31L ❤ 91🔁 66 At PLOS ONE, we recognise the importance of negative results as a crucial piece of the scientific puzzle #scidata18 ❤ 65🔁 24 “Biomaterials, biomedical devices, and our expertise in 3D printing of biomaterials for biomedical devices are some of the most important emerging areas in science and technology”-Michael McAlpine, Guest Editor for our #Biomaterials collec… ❤ 389🔁 140 From tissue engineering to 3D printing, Guest Editors Aldo Boccaccini, @KHamadLab, Michael McAlpine & Jie Song are inviting interdisciplinary researchers to submit to our #biomaterials #CallForPapers. Submit #OpenSource tools,protocols… ❤ 209🔁 80 Researchers from #Italy investigate the tools used by "Ötzi"' the Tyrolean Iceman which reveals he travelled throughout the alps but was not a skilled flintknapper https://t.co/5VrDdXK29K ❤ 70🔁 38

💡 Facts

🗓️Joined X in 2009 — 17 years ago.
📤Posts about 0.1× per week.
💬0.24% engagement rate.
🏅Earned the 100K Followers for passing 100K followers.

🕵️ Fake follower check

Estimated
52/100
Fair Credibility score
82%
Real Real audience
Low Fake-follower risk
High Data confidence
  • Est. 82% real, active audience · Low fake-follower risk.
  • Limited engagement data — score uses the signals available.
  • Organic base — far more followers than accounts it follows.
  • Established account (17+ years old).
  • 0.24% engagement — below the ~14.4% typical for this size.

Heuristic estimate from engagement, follower ratios, account age & growth — a screening signal, not a guarantee.

About

PLOS One is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online science publication.

📸 Gallery

Frequently asked questions

How much does PLOS One charge for a sponsorship?
PLOS One hasn't published fixed prices yet. Send a proposal through SocialDB and agree terms directly — your payment is held in escrow until the work is approved.
How do I contact PLOS One for a brand deal or collaboration?
Send a paid deal or collab request right here on SocialDB — we notify PLOS One, and once they accept, your payment is held safely in escrow and released when the work is approved. You don't need to track down an email.
How many followers does PLOS One have?
PLOS One has 124,131 followers on X.

✉ Message PLOS One

Reaching out to influencers is a Pro feature. Upgrade to message any influencer directly — perfect for brands and agencies booking sponsorships.

See Pro $9.95/mo →

Already Pro? Log in.

🎤 Event / appearance with PLOS One

Booking an event / appearance is a Pro feature. Upgrade to book PLOS One for an in-person or virtual appearance — payment held safely in escrow until the event is done.

See Pro $9.95/mo →

Already Pro? Log in.

Auto-generated from X's public data — no affiliation with or endorsement by SocialDB. Is this you? Claim it · Remove

✉️ Contact