Tim Donaghy

Mastodon @timdonaghy@fediscience.org

⚔ Compare ☆ Follow Own this channel?

🔄 Data last refreshed 5 hours ago

🤝

Make a deal with Tim Donaghy

🔒 Paid proposals held safely in escrow — released only when the work's approved.

Followers

323

Account age

3 yrs

🎁 Free analysisfor Tim Donaghy

🕵️Fake Followers CheckReal-audience % & bot risk→ 📊Engagement rateBenchmarked vs. peers→ 💰What they chargeFair sponsored-post price→

📊 Post engagement

Avg engagement / post

2.8%

Engagement vs followers

Nov 2022

On Mastodon since

🔥 Top post: Abusive corporate power is 🛢️building a massive dirty oil pipeli · 16 likes + reposts

📊 Activity & format

Posting cadence

4.4 / week

Posts several times a week.

Content mix

Mostly text

Recent: 9 text · 3 image · 0 video.

Follower / following

0.6×

Follows 512 back. A more reciprocal / networked account.

Recent posts

View on Mastodon ↗

🔥 Top post Abusive corporate power is 🛢️building a massive dirty oil pipeline despite historic Indigenous resistance 💵then baselessly suing Greenpeace over it for $300 million, a lawsuit that could take Greenpeace USA down Even the WSJ gets it. #NoDAPL https://www.wsj.com/business/energy-o… ★ 16

Interesting New Report from Oil Change Intl 🚨 "Despite over 50 years of failure, governments are pouring billions into ineffective carbon capture and fossil hydrogen projects. Our latest report reveals USD 30 billion has already been wast… New research from Oil Change Intl "Researchers analyzed shipping logs, satellite images and other open-source industry data to track 65 oil and fuel shipments to Israel between 21 October last year and 12 July." https://www.theguardian.com… ★ 1 I stole this thread from my co-author Andres over on the birdsite 10/x https://x.com/ndreschang/status/1825621434426708300 Our analysis did not account for certain pollutants incl. benzene; catastrophic events (e.g. explosions); harms elsewhere in the LNG value chain; or climate impacts. These also matter for understanding the disastrous impact of continuing L…

Nationally, Black & Hispanic Americans would experience pollution from LNG terminals at 110–170% rate of white Americans The most impacted areas are already overburdened with other pollution and climate threats Results are consistent w hea… If DOE stops approving new LNG export applications, it would save an estimated 707–1,110 lives and avoid $9.88–$15.1 billion in health costs through 2050, compared to the full buildout. 7/x

We estimated cumulative 2023-2050 impacts under different buildout scenarios. The "operating projects only" scenario leads to 2,020 deaths and $28.7 B in health costs. The "full buildout" scenario leads to 4,470 premature deaths and $62.… What we found: Permitted emissions from operating terminals could cause up to 60 premature deaths and $957 million in health costs per year. These numbers increase to 149 deaths and $2.33 billion per year, if all projects are built. 5/x We plugged these emissions into EPA's COBRA tool, which estimates county O3 & PM2.5 air concentration changes, then calculates increases in premature death, asthma & other harms based on known relationships between air pollution levels and…

To capture the impact of the LNG buildout, we created a database of permitted emissions limits of PM2.5, NOx, SO2 and VOCs for 32 operating, under construction and planned LNG projects. The data was drawn from draft and final air permits. … The debate on LNG exports has focused on climate and geopolitics, with less attention paid to local health and environmental justice impacts. This report strengthens the body of evidence that LNG exports are not in the public interest and …

🐘 Community & instance

Home server

fediscience.org

Their home server on the fediverse — the instance a creator picks signals the community they belong to.

On Mastodon since

Nov 2022

Joined in the Twitter-exodus wave of late 2022 — part of the migration that made Mastodon a real destination.

💡 Facts

🗓️Joined Mastodon in 2022 — 3 years ago.

👁️Averages 9 views per post.

📤Posts about 4.4× per week.

🕵️ Fake follower check

Estimated

80/100

Excellent Credibility score

97%

Real Real audience

Low Fake-follower risk

High Data confidence

Est. 97% real, active audience · Low fake-follower risk.
Strong engagement (~2.8% of followers engage each post) — an active, real audience.
Established account (3+ years old).

Heuristic estimate from engagement, follower ratios, account age & growth — a screening signal, not a guarantee.

💚 Brand affinity

Estimated

Brands Tim Donaghy's audience is most likely to respond to — from detected sponsorships in this niche.

The Guardian

About

Research Director for Greenpeace USA, focused on climate, energy, environmental justice, and science policy. Ph.D. research in high-energy astrophysics. Formerly scientific integrity at UCS, sustainable development at Global Ministries. Probably some random posting about politics, activism, democracy, math, tech, osint, python, maps, etc. Views are my own. Also @quinn43 on the birdsite. he/him 🏳️‍🌈