LIVE
⭐8.8M influencer listings 🏢98K sponsor listings 🌍120.1B combined audience reach 📊13 platforms indexed 🗺️130+ countries covered 🏷️10,000+ niches 🦋4.1M Bluesky creators 🎙️1.4M podcast creators 🟣1.3M Twitch creators 📈724.5K Pinterest creators 🥊313.7K Kick creators 264.9K YouTube creators 𝕏254.8K X creators 🐘248.6K Mastodon creators 🎵137.3K TikTok creators ✈️107.6K Telegram creators 🎮14K Discord creators 📈11.4K Substack creators 🎬4.6K Rumble creators 🧵3.6K Threads creators ⭐8.8M influencer listings 🏢98K sponsor listings 🌍120.1B combined audience reach 📊13 platforms indexed 🗺️130+ countries covered 🏷️10,000+ niches 🦋4.1M Bluesky creators 🎙️1.4M podcast creators 🟣1.3M Twitch creators 📈724.5K Pinterest creators 🥊313.7K Kick creators 264.9K YouTube creators 𝕏254.8K X creators 🐘248.6K Mastodon creators 🎵137.3K TikTok creators ✈️107.6K Telegram creators 🎮14K Discord creators 📈11.4K Substack creators 🎬4.6K Rumble creators 🧵3.6K Threads creators
The Luddite
🤝

Make a deal with The Luddite

🔒 Paid proposals held safely in escrow — released only when the work's approved.

Every booking is a normal escrow-protected deal.

Followers
1.6K
Account age
2 yrs
🎁 Free analysisfor The Luddite

Known for

📊 Post engagement

Recent posts · likes + reposts
Jun 5latest
25
Avg engagement / post
13–16
Typical post (engagement)
1.6%
Engagement vs followers
53/100
Consistent reach
Oct 2023
On Mastodon since
Half of recent posts land between 13 and 16 likes + reposts (median 15) — a dependable floor a sponsored post can count on.

🔥 Top post: Longshot, but looking to connect to someone who took Eng 101 at · 88 likes + reposts

📊 Activity & format

Posting cadence
1.5 / week
A lower-frequency account — each post lands with more weight.
Content mix
Mostly text
Recent: 8 text · 4 image · 0 video.
Follower / following
5.2×
Follows 300 back. A strong ratio — an audience that follows them, not a follow-for-follow network.
🔥 Top post Longshot, but looking to connect to someone who took Eng 101 at Arizona State University in Spring or Fall of 2020 who received the following email (or one like it). Boosts greatly appreciated. ★ 88
Let this be a lesson to misinformation scholarship on the conceptual limitations of their frameworks. Here we see actual "bias" at work, but a more complex version outside the simple left/right they love to use, and which mostly concerns … ★ 16 Media Bias/Fact Check updated their about page to include some cherry-picked results from our study. They show our count of its popularity without including a link to the source, presumably because our study is critical. They do this immed… ★ 25 One of the peer reviewers who rejected this paper put it best, so we will give them the last word on this thread: >The authors' comments about the MBFC scores reflecting the "common idea of the liberal media" miss the Okkam's [sic] Razor s… ★ 16 We go through the history of MBFC's frameworks, arguing that they have their roots in a conservative political project to discredit the press. MBFC then quantifies this propaganda campaign as data and, aided by the work of misinformation … ★ 15 We couldn't find a single paper in our database that adequately described MBFC. Instead, the misinformation literature has, with much irony, mass hallucinated institutional credentials for MBFC, referring to it as a "fact checking organiza… ★ 15 We show that MBFC's rubric is comically unrigorous. It didn't even have a serious-looking methodology section until 2025, despite its already widespread use. We then break down its current, post-2025 methodology page, which is poorly conce… ★ 13 We try to count how much of the misinformation literature relies on Dave. This turns out to be hard, because people don't put it in their references, so we have to build a database and scrape the manuscript text, but we find that it's some… ★ 14 New pre-print: Stop using Media Bias/Fact Check in research. https://theluddite.org/post/stop-using-mbfc.html This project began as a post about a year ago, in which we followed the provenance of the data from a study about misinformation… ★ 73 @AxiosNews How are you still printing this dumbass-involved writing in the year of our lord 2026? ★ 10 From a 1950 report for the Senate Committee on Expenditures in the Executive Departments titled "Employment of Homosexuals and Other Sex Perverts in Government." I ran into this while doing some research for something unrelated and I thin… ★ 4 I will probably be pretty quiet here again for a while because it is election season, and I am very involved in DSA's electoral work in Vermont. If you're in the US and excited about DSA's recent wins, JOIN US! These wins are not coming o… ★ 8

🐘 Community & instance

Home server
assemblag.es
Their home server on the fediverse — the instance a creator picks signals the community they belong to.
✅ Link-verified
Verified link
Proved ownership of a website linked on their profile — Mastodon's green-check verification, a real identity signal rather than a paid badge.
On Mastodon since
Oct 2023
An established account with real history on the platform.

💡 Facts

🗓️Joined Mastodon in 2023 — 2 years ago.
👁️Averages 25 views per post.
📤Posts about 1.5× per week.

🕵️ Fake follower check

Estimated
70/100
Good Credibility score
87%
Real Real audience
Low Fake-follower risk
High Data confidence
  • Est. 87% real, active audience · Low fake-follower risk.
  • Engagement (~1.6% of followers engage each post) is around typical for Mastodon.
  • Verified account.

Heuristic estimate from engagement, follower ratios, account age & growth — a screening signal, not a guarantee.

About

Once, long ago, we were miserable. We lived in cold, dark caves, until someone figured out fire, which lead directly to the iPhone. Most of that happened very slowly, but then we came up with capitalism. Suddenly, we went from no iPhones for 200,000 years, to the iPhone 15 — all in the last two decades! We all know that technology is progress, but progress towards what? Where exactly are we going? And who the hell is driving? What are computers even for, and why do I need one in my fridge?

📸 Gallery

Frequently asked questions

How much does The Luddite charge for a sponsorship?
The Luddite hasn't published fixed prices yet. Send a proposal through SocialDB and agree terms directly — your payment is held in escrow until the work is approved.
How do I contact The Luddite for a brand deal or collaboration?
Send a paid deal or collab request right here on SocialDB — we notify The Luddite, and once they accept, your payment is held safely in escrow and released when the work is approved. You don't need to track down an email.
How many followers does The Luddite have?
The Luddite has 1,571 followers on Mastodon.

✉ Message The Luddite

Reaching out to influencers is a Pro feature. Upgrade to message any influencer directly — perfect for brands and agencies booking sponsorships.

See Pro $9.95/mo →

Already Pro? Log in.

🎤 Event / appearance with The Luddite

Booking an event / appearance is a Pro feature. Upgrade to book The Luddite for an in-person or virtual appearance — payment held safely in escrow until the event is done.

See Pro $9.95/mo →

Already Pro? Log in.

Auto-generated from Mastodon's public data — no affiliation with or endorsement by SocialDB. Is this you? Claim it · Remove

✉️ Contact