The Luddite✓ Add us as a preferred source on Google
Make a deal with The Luddite
🔒 Paid proposals held safely in escrow — released only when the work's approved.
Known for
88 views
Longshot, but looking to connect to someone who took Eng 101 at Arizona State University in Spring or Fall of 2020 who received the following email (or one like it). Boosts greatly appreciated.
25 views
Media Bias/Fact Check updated their about page to include some cherry-picked results from our study. They show our count of its popularity without including a link to the source, presumably because our study is critical. They do this immediately after linking to studies that use and praise MBFC.
In other words, the misinformation dataset guy spun our study and didn't bother to cite their source.
10 views
@AxiosNews How are you still printing this dumbass-involved writing in the year of our lord 2026?
4 views
From a 1950 report for the Senate Committee on Expenditures in the Executive Departments titled "Employment of Homosexuals and Other Sex Perverts in Government."
I ran into this while doing some research for something unrelated and I think that, given the times, people should know about it.
scanned copy (but no OCR; I transcribed myself for alt text so any typos are my own): https://mattachinesoc
📊 Post engagement
🔥 Top post: Longshot, but looking to connect to someone who took Eng 101 at · 88 likes + reposts
📊 Activity & format
Recent posts
View on Mastodon ↗
🔥 Top post
Longshot, but looking to connect to someone who took Eng 101 at Arizona State University in Spring or Fall of 2020 who received the following email (or one like it). Boosts greatly appreciated.
Media Bias/Fact Check updated their about page to include some cherry-picked results from our study. They show our count of its popularity without including a link to the source, presumably because our study is critical. They do this immed…
One of the peer reviewers who rejected this paper put it best, so we will give them the last word on this thread:
>The authors' comments about the MBFC scores reflecting the "common idea of the liberal media" miss the Okkam's [sic] Razor s…
We go through the history of MBFC's frameworks, arguing that they have their roots in a conservative political project to discredit the press. MBFC then quantifies this propaganda campaign as data and, aided by the work of misinformation …
We couldn't find a single paper in our database that adequately described MBFC. Instead, the misinformation literature has, with much irony, mass hallucinated institutional credentials for MBFC, referring to it as a "fact checking organiza…
We show that MBFC's rubric is comically unrigorous. It didn't even have a serious-looking methodology section until 2025, despite its already widespread use. We then break down its current, post-2025 methodology page, which is poorly conce…
We try to count how much of the misinformation literature relies on Dave. This turns out to be hard, because people don't put it in their references, so we have to build a database and scrape the manuscript text, but we find that it's some…
New pre-print: Stop using Media Bias/Fact Check in research.
https://theluddite.org/post/stop-using-mbfc.html
This project began as a post about a year ago, in which we followed the provenance of the data from a study about misinformation…
@AxiosNews How are you still printing this dumbass-involved writing in the year of our lord 2026?
From a 1950 report for the Senate Committee on Expenditures in the Executive Departments titled "Employment of Homosexuals and Other Sex Perverts in Government."
I ran into this while doing some research for something unrelated and I thin…
I will probably be pretty quiet here again for a while because it is election season, and I am very involved in DSA's electoral work in Vermont.
If you're in the US and excited about DSA's recent wins, JOIN US! These wins are not coming o…
🐘 Community & instance
💡 Facts
🕵️ Fake follower check
Estimated- Est. 87% real, active audience · Low fake-follower risk.
- Engagement (~1.6% of followers engage each post) is around typical for Mastodon.
- Verified account.
Heuristic estimate from engagement, follower ratios, account age & growth — a screening signal, not a guarantee.
About
📸 Gallery
🔀 Audience overlap
EstimatedEstimated shared audience with similar creators — useful for avoiding overlap (or doubling down) when planning a campaign.
More like this
Find more →Frequently asked questions
How much does The Luddite charge for a sponsorship?
How do I contact The Luddite for a brand deal or collaboration?
How many followers does The Luddite have?
✉ Message The Luddite
Reaching out to influencers is a Pro feature. Upgrade to message any influencer directly — perfect for brands and agencies booking sponsorships.
- ✓ Message any influencer from their listing
- ✓ The influencer gets notified by email
- ✓ Manage every conversation in one inbox
Already Pro? Log in.
🎤 Event / appearance with The Luddite
Booking an event / appearance is a Pro feature. Upgrade to book The Luddite for an in-person or virtual appearance — payment held safely in escrow until the event is done.
- ✓ Book them for events, livestreams, panels & more
- ✓ The Luddite gets notified by email
- ✓ Fee held in escrow, released after the appearance
Already Pro? Log in.
You're out of free requests this month
Free accounts get 5 per month. Go Pro for unlimited sponsor pitches, collab requests & sponsorship deals — plus featured placement, the Verified badge, free withdrawals and more.
Upgrade to Pro — $9.95/mo →Your free limit resets on the 1st of next month.
Auto-generated from Mastodon's public data — no affiliation with or endorsement by SocialDB. Is this you? Claim it · Remove